Camden NJ, May 24, 2012. Yesterday two Obama voters found an innovative new way to give their baby a bath, and have run the risk of being in trouble with the law as a result.
The baby daddy was videotaped by a laundromat's security camera putting their very small child into a washing machine, presumably to give the baby a much needed bath. When the baby mama noticed her child spinning around in hot soapy water she panicked, and both of them tried frantically to open the washer door.
Unfortunately the door was locked until the cycle completes, so they ran for help. A laundromat attendant arrived and calmly pulled the plug on the machine, and the couple scooped up their baby and left immediately, leaving all their clothing behind. Later, the baby daddy returned to claim his laundry, saying the baby was just fine.
The laundromat owner, an Asian woman, said that the father's
actions were "ridiculous," and she was thankful that her employee was
able to get the child out of the machine before he was seriously
injured. She does not know the toddler's parents, but reported the
incident to Camden police.
Flannel clad thug parents give their baby a bath
Authorities are now searching for the babies parents. They say the matter
does not appear to be criminal, but have referred it to the
state's Division of Youth and Family Services for further action.
Reverend Al Sharpton still hasn't decided if he will lead a protest and boycott against the laundromat for creating this hazardous condition.
"We all know that if this laundromat was in a white neighborhood, there would have been some kind of emergency power cutoff on the machine. This is another obvious case of white racism, but this time the racists are Asians," Sharpton told us.
A few days ago in a high school classroom in Salisbury, North Carolina, a social studies teacher
was caught on a
phone camera telling a student in her classroom that he could be
arrested for speaking ill of President Obama.
Tonya Dixon-Neely, a North Rowan High School
teacher, initiated the political discussion in her social studies classroom,
explaining to students how Mitt Romney bullied a fellow classmate in
school, pinned him down and cut his hair.
But then one student questions her statement, adding that he had heard that Obama bullied a girl himself when he was in school.
Unfortunately for Ms. Dixon-Neely, someone in the classroom used their cell phone to record the exchange, and then posted it on YouTube. Once a recording is made, it is very difficult to deny you said something, or claim it was taken out of context. Because the whole context is there.
Ms. Dixon-Neely lashed out against the student saying, “Stop, no, because there is no comparison,” says Dixon-Neely. “Romney is running for president. Obama is the president.” The student argues that they are both “just men.” But the teacher
continues to argue that it is OK to criticize Romney but not President
Obama.
Ms. Dixon-Neely
On the tape, as the incident escalates, Dixon-Neely is heard yelling at the student. “Listen, let me tell you something, you will not disrespect the president of the United States in this classroom,” says Dixon-Neely.
The student makes a remark about free speech and that he will continue to speak his mind. “Not about him you won’t,” says Neely. She then suggests that the student could be arrested for talking against the President.
“Do you realize that people were arrested for saying things bad about
Bush? Do you realize you are not supposed to slander the president?”
Why should you be concerned about any of this?
Because you now have documented proof that teachers are bullying students who try to openly express their views in a classroom. And remember, the teacher is the one who introduced the topic, then threatened the student when she didn't like his response.
It certainly is no crime for a teacher to have strong political views. And it is not even a crime for them to express them in the classroom. But this teacher crossed the line and acted like a propaganda agent for the Democrat Party, shouting and yelling at any student who dared to criticize the President.
And exactly what was that criticism that "could get them arrested?" The student simply pointed out that President Obama had admitted to bullying when he was young, which is exactly what Ms. Dixon-Neely was accusing Mitt Romney of.
But Ms. Dixon-Neely's biggest mistake was getting caught.
This sort of leftwing proselytizing goes on thousands of times a day in our classrooms. It just doesn't get recorded very often, so the teacher can always say "I never did that." This time there is proof.
Just like the Rodney King beating would have been a non story without the tape, this wouldn't even make the news if the video tape didn't exist. No matter what you think about the Rodney King incident, one fact is beyond dispute. That tape resulted in police departments all over America making reforms. It really would be great if this tape had the same effect on our schools.
And what became of Ms. Dixon-Neely? Initially nothing happened, until the YouTube video got out, and thousands of parents expressed their outrage. So the School System had no choice but to reluctantly suspend Ms. Dixon-Neely. With full pay.
Washington DC, May 19, 2012. Most people just
assume that President Barack Hussein Obama, D-Kenya, is running unopposed for
the 2012 Democrat Party nomination.
However, this simply isn't true. He does have one
challenger who has managed to get on the ballot in a few states. John Wolfe Jr,
a long time Democrat and attorney from Tennessee has challenged the president in
several states so far.
Wolfe took part in the New Hampshire "lesser known
candidates forum" in December 2011. He qualified for the ballot in the New Hampshire
Democratic primary, in which he received 246 votes, 0.4% of the vote total. In
addition to New Hampshire, he has qualified for presidential primary ballots in
the states of Missouri, Louisiana and Arkansas.
In the Louisiana primary, Wolfe polled 11.83% which
qualified him to earn a minimum of three delegates to the 2012 Democratic
National Convention. Following the primary, officials of the Democratic Party of
Louisiana announced that Wolfe was ineligible for the delegates he had
apparently won because, according to the party officials, Wolfe had not properly
complied with the party's qualification requirements. In response, Wolfe filed a
lawsuit against the party, disputing the claim that he did not qualify to
receive the delegates.
Following incumbent
President Barack Obama's narrower-than-expected primary win in West Virginia,
where convicted felon Keith Russell Judd finished a strong second as a protest
vote, press began to speculate on the possibility of Wolfe, who lacks Judd's
criminal record, possibly contending and even winning the state of Arkansas.
A
poll conducted by Hendrix College of Democrats in Arkansas's 4th congressional
district showed Wolfe within seven points of Obama there. Should Wolfe succeed
in that feat, it would mark the first time since 1980 that a sitting incumbent
had not won every state in his party's primary.
After a poll released this week showed President
Barack Obama only beating his Democratic primary opponent John Wolfe Jr. by
seven points, 45 percent to 38 percent, in Arkansas's Fourth Congressional
District, state Democrats moved to practically disenfranchise Arkansas voters.
"Delegates Wolfe might claim won't be recognized at the national convention,"
national party officials are telling state Democrats. Wolfe is being
accused of not following the party rules.
“They want a coronation,” Wolfe
said. “They’re conflating [Obama] with the party. Are we supposed to call him
‘Dear Leader’? Is this some kind of North Korea thing?”
Wolfe insists
he’s done the due diligence to qualify for delegates and that the state party is
making decisions ad hoc to get the results they desire.
“This is
ridiculous," he says. "These guys are trying to tamp down voter enthusiasm.”
If he's denied delegates he's rightfully won, Wolfe says, Democrats
would be effectively disenfranchising those who chose him over President Obama.
And if that happens, he’ll take his own party to court.
“They took my
money and put my name on the ballot,” he says. “They’re trying to make people
think it’s hopeless to vote against Obama.” Wolfe is also on the ballot for
Texas’s primary on May 29.
NYC, May 16, 2012. On this week's Newsweek cover the national news magazine has announced that President Barack Hussein Obama, D-Kenya, is our "The First Gay President".
Newsweek is using the shock factor of labeling the previously assumed straight, married, father-of-two President to draw attention to itself and to boost circulation.
The President had been carefully and slowly "evolving" his position on gay marriage rights, until Vice President Joe Biden forced his hand by coming out for gay marriage rights a few days earlier.
Not wanting to be upstaged by his own VP, who is widely considered an imbecile, President Obama immediately jumped onto the gay marriage bandwagon.
Obama’s latest announcement was a reversal of his 2004 view that
“marriage is something sanctified between a man and a woman." At that
time, he also indicated that civil unions were adequate for gays and
lesbians. He contended that the difference between marriage and civil
unions was partly just a matter of “semantics.”
There was little doubt that Newsweek would be covering the President's historic announcement that he supports same-sex marriage after he had a sit-down television interview confirming what many already believed to be the case.
Time Magazine strikes back!
This was, however, the first time that a sitting President had done so, and the magazine asserts that such a move was a calculated one that had been thoroughly planned.
'It’s easy to write off President Obama’s announcement of his support for gay marriage as a political ploy during an election year. But don’t believe the cynics,' representatives from Newsweek said.
President Obama's announcement came several days after Vice President
Joe Biden said that he was 'absolutely comfortable with the fact that
men marrying men, women marrying women and men and women marrying are
entitled to the same exact rights, all the civil rights, all the civil
liberties.'
The move, thought to be a misstep as he made his opinion known before Mr Obama publicly declared his, was criticized by many within the administration and outside of the White House.
'Would I have preferred to have done this in my own way, in my own terms, without I think, there being a lot of notice to everybody? Sure,' Mr Obama said in the ABC interview. 'But all's well that ends well.'
On the day of the President's interview, Mr Biden is said to have had a private meeting in the Oval Office in which he apologized for his overstep.
Republicans, the majority of whom are against gay marriage, said that Mr
Obama simply made his historic announcement in an effort to gain
support among liberal voters in the lead up to the general election.
Barack and Hugo swapping spit
'While President Obama has played politics on this issue, the Republican Party and our presumptive nominee Mitt Romney have been clear,' Republican national committee chairman Reince Priebus said in a statement.
'We support maintaining marriage between one man and one woman and would oppose any attempts to change that.'
Washington DC, May 15, 2012. It was just a few years ago that Chris Matthews was begging to see Sarah Palin go on Jeopardy claiming she would quite possibly look like “an imbecile” and “doesn’t know anything.”
In fact, on at least four occasions, MSNBC's Chris Matthews mocked Sarah Palin for how he felt she'd do if she were ever on the hit television game show Jeopardy.
Yesterday Chris Mathews got his chance to go on Jeopardy himself, to show us how smart he is.
The results weren't good for Mathews. On yesterday's "Power Players" version of the show Mathews came up short finishing dead last with the paltry sum of only $2,300. Matthews was matched up against CNN's Lizzie O'Leary and former Obama White House press secretary Robert Gibbs.
Matthews looked confused and outmatched on the episode. He
shouted out answers when it wasn't his turn and flunked basic arithmetic
-- saying Istanbul fit the category of "6-Letter Capitals." Matthews
came in third out of three players. Dead last.
When Double Jeopardy ended, Matthews had only won $4,600,
almost $10,000 behind O'Leary and over $8,000 less than Gibbs.
Then all three leftwing pundits missed the Final Jeopardy question, the game ended with Gibbs having $5,600, O'Leary $4,200, and Matthews pulling
up the rear at only $2,300.
Now remember, this was a man who on October 2, 2008, shortly before that evening's Vice Presidential debate, said of Palin:
"Is this [vice presidential debate] about her brain power?... Do you
think cute will beat brains?...Do you think she’d do better on the
questions on Jeopardy! or the interview they do during a half-time?...My
suspicion is that she has the same lack of intellectual curiosity that
the President of the United States has right now and that is scary!"
"They find these empty vessels who know nothing about the world! Nothing
about foreign policy! Who immediately begin to spout the neo-con line. I
read her book — it’s full of that crap....It’s unbelievable how little
this woman knows!...Don’t put her on Jeopardy!”
“Senator, do you think Sarah Palin is qualified to be President of the
United States?...If she were on Jeopardy! right now and the topic was
national government, American government generally defined, would she
look like an imbecile, or would she look okay? Does she know anything?"
“I’d like to see her on just a couple of episodes of Celebrity
Jeopardy! or It’s Academic Mac McGarry to just see if she knows
anything.”
Hopefully, Mathews will have learned a lesson from this, and will have enough sense not to mock others for their intellect... when he clearly is pretty helpless himself.
President Obama (far right, 2nd row) with friends from Yemen
Washington DC, May 6,
2012. On the first anniversary of Osama bin Laden's death information has been obtained that the Al-Qaeda leader had the highest respect for CBS News.
In
fact Bin Laden had concluded that CBS News was "close to being
unbiased". ABC also got high marks from the terrorist group, but CNN was
criticized for being "too close to the U.S. Government."
At
one time Al-Qaeda was very high on MSNBC, but their opinion has changed
now that the network has fired their star host Keith Olbermann.
"We still love Rachel Maddow," an Al-Qaeda spokesman told us, "she have pretty face, just like goat."
American-born media adviser for al-Qaeda Adam Gadahn warned Bin Laden to
beware of the broadcasters' "cunning methods" as he described Fox News
as a channel in the "abyss" that should "die in anger".
In a memorandum made public by the US military's
Combating Terrorism Center last Thursday, Bin Laden asked for advice on
exploiting the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.
Al-Qaeda is endorsing Barack Obama again
"We
need to benefit from this event and get our messages to the Muslims and
celebrate the victory that they achieved. We need to restore their
confidence in their nation and motivate them. We should also present our
just cause to the world, especially to the European people," he said.
Bin Laden suggested contacting Al-Jazeera.
"You can point out to them that this way they will be showing the other opinion," he said.
Bin
Laden also wondered if it would be good to work with an American
channel, suggesting CBS as "close to being unbiased". Bin Laden had
admired CBS for their bold plan to forge documents during the 2004
election in order to help elect John Kerry. "That Dan Rather man is doing Allah's work." Osama Bin Laden often said.
Terrorist groups are not fond of Sean Hannity or Fox News
A
US-born al-Qaida spokesman, Adam Gadahn, wrote back to Bin Laden laying
the merits or otherwise of using US news stations to mark the
"Manhattan battle" as it is referred to in the memo.
Fox News is dismissed because it "falls into the abyss as you know, and lacks neutrality too".
"I
used to think that MSNBC channel may be good and neutral a bit, but is
has lately fired Keith Olbermann," wrote Gadahn.
CNN is questioned, although its Arabic "version brings good and detailed reports".
"As
for the neutrality of CNN in English, it seems to be in cooperation
with the government more than the others (except Fox News of course),"
he said. Gadhan describes ABC as "all right":
American born Adam Gadahn awaiting his drone missile
"Actually
it could be one of the best channels, as far as we are concerned. It is
interested in al-Qaida issues, particularly the journalist Brian Ross,
who is specialized in terrorism. The channel is still proud for its
interview with the sheik (Bin Laden)," he said.
"CBS channel was
mentioned by the sheik. I see that it is like the other channels, but
it has a famous program (60 Minutes) that has some popularity and a good
reputation for its long broadcasting time. Only god knows the reality,
as I am not really in a position to do so."
